Recently Posted

Archive for the ‘Random’ Category

Unfortunately the drink and debauchery has had to come to an end and we are now back at work, though not at full capacity until Monday.

First of all I will apologise for the lack of posts recently, December is a bit of a hectic month at the best of times but we have also taken on 3 new clients, and been looking for new larger offices.

I will be trying to spend a little more time blogging over the next few weeks.

Hopefully we can also have the new offices sorted by the end of this month, but we will be keeping the postal address the same in order to avoid confusion for our clients.

I hope every one had a good break over Christmas and hope we all have a profitable year!

*Ok so either Live Writer is useless or I am a moron and can’t do posts with tables very well. I have quickly done screen shots of the info and posted that, if I get some time later I will redo it all*

So my last post was a bit of a rant about my Blog not validating and that I have decided to check some other sites around the Internet to see how popular developing websites with valid markup actually is.

My first lot of checks were Blogs from around the Internet, most of them are listed in Technorti’s Popular Blogs list however I have added several other ones that either I read frequently or I perceive to be quite big.

Read the rest of this entry »

The original reason for me starting this post was for me to justify to myself that this blog does not actually validate using the W3C Markup Validation Service even though I happen to have a Valid XHTML 1.0 logo in my right sidebar(which I will remove after this post). Now I am not out to deliberately deceive people by making them think this blog is valid when it is not, it is just because as I have made posts or added things to my sidebar the site has developed validation errors. At the time of writing the homepage has 20 errors, I expect it will have many more by the time I finish this post. So anyway I thought to myself how many other blogs actually advertise they are W3C Valid when they are not, so I began looking around a few of the sites I read and also some of the top Technorati Blogs. To my surprise not many people actually declare they are valid the only 2 I found before I gave up looking for the logo or Valid Refer Link (XHTML) were Matt Cutts Blog and the SEOmoz Blog. When I checked both the Blogs Matt Cuts had 20 errors and SEOmoz had 29, though it is worth noting that the SEOmoz homepage is actually valid. Yeay I thought I am not the only one with this problem and I think the problem is basically brought about by the fact that a lot of blogs actually start out as W3C Valid and as we make posts more and more errors get added, the only way to avoid it is to validate the Blog each time a post is made and then make the required changes which is just a nuisance.

In fact is it really the bloggers responsibility to validate their blog? I have been using Windows Live Writer for 2 weeks now, as I am sure you are aware it is a desktop application that allows easy WYSIWYG Authoring of posts so surely Live Writer should be responsible for turning the my post into Valid HTML/XHTML? After all I am sure not every blogger out there is that proficient at HTML or even knows what W3C is, so why would they check for validation?

I suppose the question people may ask me (and I ask myself sometimes) is why should I care about that stupid W3C validation anyway? Well:

W3C was created to ensure compatibility and agreement among industry members in the adoption of new standards. Prior to its creation, incompatible versions of HTML were offered by different vendors, increasing the potential for inconsistency between web pages.

Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3c

In fact there are some arguments that not conforming to the Web Accessibility Guidelines (Not the same as W3C Valid Markup) is actually against the law.

  1. The UK 1995 Disability Discrimination Act - how does your website measure up?
  2. Disabled access to web sites under UK law

So anyway this all got me thinking a little more, how many other websites out there do not have W3C Valid Markup. So I decided to ignore my morning list of tasks and have a look around at what sites failed or passed the W3C Markup Validation. I am going to post the results in the next post as this one is lengthy enough as it is.

Please also note, as far as I am aware all the following data is correct, I used the validator.w3.org tool to check all the sites and I have only copied the results from there. Also while I have checked some accessibility sites etc just because they don’t validate does not mean they are not accessible several sites on the list have text alternative websites etc. I am not a usability expert but I assume a text alternative is not the ideal solution to accessibility though. Actually the Web Accessibility Guidelines Checklist actually states

If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page.

ifollowltgreenOk so I think I said I followed comments in the past but a couple of people have commented recently and I noticed they were nofollow. I have installed Lucia’s Linky Love so links will actually be nofollow if you have never posted before. I have set the limit to 3 so it wont take much to switch to dofollow, and I will manually remove the nofollow from links under the 3 link count presuming it is not spammy. Some of the features of Linky Love are:

    1. Encourages good comments: Dofollows are added to the author “name” and links in comment text after a commenter leaves some minimum number of comments. The blogger can set this minimum number to anything between 3 and 10. This encourages regular visitors to comment, but discourages spammers by forcing them to visit your blog many times before they get “dofollows”.
    2. Encourages links. Dofollows are added to trackbacks and pingbacks only after the blog author has left some minimum number of comments, trackbacks or pingbacks. This discourages scrapper sites from sending you spammy trackbacks but rewards real bloggers for linking you.
    3. Gives peace of mind. Dofollows will not be added to comments left more than 14 days after you published your most recent post. This is a safety feature that prevents your blog from becoming a link farm should you ever be unexpectedly absent from your blog due to illness or any other major life event.
    4. Thwarts overly aggressive SEO types. The blogger may refuse “dofollows” to “names” that contain too many characters. This can be used to avoid giving “dofollows” to commenter’s who claim their name is “cashmere dog sweater”.
    5. Gives you more control over dofollow / nofollow options. As is always the case, the blogger can also delete the comment, report the comment to Akismet or delete the name or url. That’s good for truly spammy comments. But with Lucia’s Linky Love, you get another, less drastic, option. You manually prevent “dofollow” but still show the comment url and name by deleting the user email address when editing the comment. This lets you permit borderline visitors continue to comment, but deprive them of “dofollows” until they behave the way you like visitors to behave.

kylie Yes believe it or not Kylie Minogue is entering into the Social Network World possibly aiming to be the next Mark Zuckerberg or Tom Anderson. Called Kylie Connect and developed by New Visions Mobile in collaboration with Kylie’s record label Parlophone the site will be the first of its kind to be launched by a celebrity.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Well seeing as I have Live Writer working ok I thought I’d try out the Insert Map function and inform you all where our lovely offices are based!

Read the rest of this entry »