<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: University Websites Fail Basic Accessibility Guidelines.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dolphinpromotions.co.uk/web-design/university-websites-fail-basic-accessibility-guidelines/86/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dolphinpromotions.co.uk/web-design/university-websites-fail-basic-accessibility-guidelines/86</link>
	<description>Design, Promote, Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: web design lancashire</title>
		<link>http://blog.dolphinpromotions.co.uk/web-design/university-websites-fail-basic-accessibility-guidelines/86/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>web design lancashire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dolphinpromotions.co.uk/2007/university-websites-fail-basic-accessibility-guidelines/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>w3c is very important, plus i remember matt cutts last week who said google are thinking of takeing w3c compliant sites into a higher consideration to search results along with relivency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>w3c is very important, plus i remember matt cutts last week who said google are thinking of takeing w3c compliant sites into a higher consideration to search results along with relivency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
